Mechanism design with side payments: Individual rationality and iterative dominance
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, we investigate the collective decision problem with incomplete information and side payments. We show that a direct mechanism associated with the social choice function that satisfies budget balancing, incentive compatibility, and interim individual rationality exists for generic prior distributions. We consider the possibility that a risk-averse principal extracts full surplus in agency problems with adverse selection. Additionally, with regard to generic prior distributions, we show that there exists a modified direct mechanism associated with the virtual social choice function, which satisfies budget balancing and interim individual rationality, such that truth telling is the unique three times iteratively undominated message rule profile. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C70, D44, D60, D71, D78, D82
منابع مشابه
Common Reasoning in Games
The focus for the Centre is research into individual and strategic decision-making using a combination of theoretical and experimental methods. On the theory side, members of the Centre investigate individual choice under uncertainty, cooperative and non-cooperative game theory, as well as theories of psychology, bounded rationality and evolutionary game theory. Members of the Centre have appli...
متن کاملReassignment-Based Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Interdependent Task Allocation with Private Costs and Execution Failures
In this study, we consider a task allocation model with interdependent tasks, where tasks are assigned based on what agents report about their privately known capabilities and costs. Since selfish agents may strategically misreport their private information in order to increase their payments, mechanism design is used to determine a payment schema that guarantees truthful reporting. Misreported...
متن کاملWeakly Dominated Strategies: a Mystery Cracked
An informal argument shows that common knowledge of rationality implies the iterative elimination of strongly dominated strategies. Rationality here means that players do not play strategies that are strongly dominated relative to their knowledge. We formalize and prove this claim. When by rationality we mean that players do not play strategies that are weakly dominated relative to their knowle...
متن کاملWeakly Dominated Strategies: a Mystery Cracked
An informal argument shows that common knowledge of rationality implies the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies. Rationality here means that players do not play strategies that are strictly dominanted relative to their knowledge. We formalize and prove this claim. When by rationality we mean that players do not play strategies that are weakly dominanted relative to their know...
متن کاملA Bargaining Mechanism for One-Way Games
We introduce one-way games, a framework motivated by applications in large-scale power restoration, humanitarian logistics, and integrated supplychains. The distinguishable feature of the games is that the payoff of some player is determined only by her own strategy and does not depend on actions taken by other players. We show that the equilibrium outcome in one-way games without payments and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 133 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007